PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.22%
Positive revenue growth while 8028.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-3.20%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
36.76%
Positive EBIT growth while 8028.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-649.64%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-0.37%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.62%
10Y CAGR of 83.62% while 8028.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
83.62%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 8028.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
65.63%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 8028.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-156.87%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 8028.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-156.87%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-277.76%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
46.13%
Equity/share CAGR of 46.13% while 8028.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
46.13%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 8028.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-48.56%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.00%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 8028.HK's 54.33%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.