PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
12.69%
Positive revenue growth while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
6.31%
Positive gross profit growth while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
43.74%
Positive EBIT growth while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
52.79%
Positive operating income growth while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
52.89%
Positive net income growth while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
14.29%
Positive EPS growth while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
14.29%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
33.33%
Share count expansion well above 8070.HK's 42.86%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
33.33%
Diluted share count expanding well above 8070.HK's 42.86%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.95%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.