PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.13%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of 8070.HK's 20.37%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
-32.23%
Negative gross profit growth while 8070.HK is at 20.47%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-1.43%
Negative EBIT growth while 8070.HK is at 144.91%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
7.47%
Operating income growth under 50% of 8070.HK's 119.49%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-20.98%
Negative net income growth while 8070.HK stands at 107.16%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-21.43%
Negative EPS growth while 8070.HK is at 105.81%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-21.43%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 8070.HK is at 105.81%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.49%
Share reduction while 8070.HK is at 23.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.49%
Reduced diluted shares while 8070.HK is at 23.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.58%
OCF growth under 50% of 8070.HK's 490.77%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
63.41%
FCF growth under 50% of 8070.HK's 324.86%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.76%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.