0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
40.79%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 8070.HK's 15.28%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
18.55%
Gross profit growth similar to 8070.HK's 20.28%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
-27.49%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-46.41%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
6.44%
Positive net income growth while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
14.29%
Positive EPS growth while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
14.29%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-3.54%
Share reduction while 8070.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.41%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 8070.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-6.41%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 8070.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-6.41%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8070.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
100.00%
OCF/share CAGR of 100.00% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
100.00%
OCF/share CAGR of 100.00% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
100.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 100.00% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
111.76%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 111.76% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
111.76%
Net income/share CAGR of 111.76% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
111.76%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 111.76% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.75%
SG&A growth well above 8070.HK's 38.64%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.