PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
48.57%
Positive revenue growth while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
8.32%
Positive gross profit growth while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
120.34%
EBIT growth above 1.5x 8070.HK's 22.48%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
184.60%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 8070.HK's 31.29%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
122.46%
Net income growth above 1.5x 8070.HK's 30.02%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
112.50%
EPS growth above 1.5x 8070.HK's 29.89%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
112.50%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 8070.HK's 29.89%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
3.67%
Share change of 3.67% while 8070.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.84%
10Y CAGR of 38.84% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
38.84%
5Y CAGR of 38.84% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
38.84%
3Y CAGR of 38.84% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-72.76%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 8070.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-72.76%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 8070.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-72.76%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8070.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.13%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.