0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
52.04%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 8070.HK's 11.64%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
31.81%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 8070.HK's 19.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-83.21%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-70.86%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-123.88%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-123.53%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-123.53%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
149.75%
10Y CAGR of 149.75% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
149.75%
5Y CAGR of 149.75% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
149.75%
3Y CAGR of 149.75% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-105.67%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 8070.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-105.67%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 8070.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-105.67%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8070.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
185.23%
Equity/share CAGR of 185.23% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
185.23%
Equity/share CAGR of 185.23% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
185.23%
Equity/share CAGR of 185.23% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.37%
SG&A growth well above 8070.HK's 37.10%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.