PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.83%
Negative revenue growth while 8070.HK stands at 6.85%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
126.59%
Positive gross profit growth while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
47.98%
Positive EBIT growth while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
42.24%
Positive operating income growth while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
38.63%
Positive net income growth while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
38.97%
Positive EPS growth while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
38.97%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.29%
10Y CAGR of 40.29% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
40.29%
5Y CAGR of 40.29% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
40.29%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 8070.HK's 34.13%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
866.91%
OCF/share CAGR of 866.91% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
866.91%
OCF/share CAGR of 866.91% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
866.91%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-22.55%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 8070.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-22.55%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 8070.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-22.55%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.55%
SG&A growth well above 8070.HK's 4.25%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.