PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.22%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x 8070.HK's 11.25%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
-3.20%
Negative gross profit growth while 8070.HK is at 22.68%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
36.76%
EBIT growth below 50% of 8070.HK's 147.82%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
-649.64%
Negative operating income growth while 8070.HK is at 146.44%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-0.37%
Negative net income growth while 8070.HK stands at 127.15%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.62%
10Y CAGR of 83.62% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
83.62%
5Y CAGR of 83.62% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
65.63%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 8070.HK's 12.59%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-156.87%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 8070.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-156.87%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 8070.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-277.76%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8070.HK is 124.49%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
46.13%
Equity/share CAGR of 46.13% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
46.13%
Equity/share CAGR of 46.13% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
-48.56%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.00%
We expand SG&A while 8070.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.