PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.30%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-16.70%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-145.58%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
46.48%
Positive operating income growth while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-24.90%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-24.39%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-24.39%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative OCF growth while 8070.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-100.00%
Negative FCF growth while 8070.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
80.17%
10Y CAGR of 80.17% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
80.17%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
130.78%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 8070.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-100.00%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-259.42%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 8070.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-259.42%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 8070.HK is 32.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-808.05%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
109.89%
Equity/share CAGR of 109.89% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
109.89%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-47.48%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
100.00%
We show growth while 8070.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-100.00%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-100.00%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-100.00%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.27%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.