PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
36.50%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 8070.HK's 0.71%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
82.42%
Positive gross profit growth while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
706.52%
Positive EBIT growth while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1395.14%
Positive operating income growth while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
1620.13%
Positive net income growth while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1537.50%
Positive EPS growth while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1537.50%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
101.79%
10Y CAGR of 101.79% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
101.79%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
45.34%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 8070.HK's 8.13%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.71%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 81.71% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
81.71%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
567.09%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 8070.HK's 148.45%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.15%
We expand SG&A while 8070.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.