PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.65%
Revenue growth under 50% of 8070.HK's 23.10%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
19.79%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of 8070.HK's 24.16%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
25.53%
EBIT growth 75-90% of 8070.HK's 33.06%. Bill Ackman would push for cost reforms or better product mix to narrow the gap.
81.17%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 8070.HK's 15.53%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
13.97%
Net income growth under 50% of 8070.HK's 68.97%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
13.91%
EPS growth of 13.91% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
13.91%
Diluted EPS growth of 13.91% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
142.69%
10Y CAGR of 142.69% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
142.69%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 8070.HK's 15.64%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-2.83%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8070.HK stands at 19.22%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.60%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 80.60% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
80.60%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 8070.HK's 16.78%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
3283.33%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 8070.HK's 132.33%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
81.84%
Equity/share CAGR of 81.84% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
81.84%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 8070.HK's 20.29%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-36.25%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.51%
We cut SG&A while 8070.HK invests at 26.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.