PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.94%
Negative revenue growth while 8070.HK stands at 15.06%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-18.47%
Negative gross profit growth while 8070.HK is at 28.46%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-30.78%
Negative EBIT growth while 8070.HK is at 272.55%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-50.06%
Negative operating income growth while 8070.HK is at 180.25%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-30.56%
Negative net income growth while 8070.HK stands at 342.02%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-30.53%
Negative EPS growth while 8070.HK is at 636.67%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-30.53%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 8070.HK is at 636.67%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.02%
Diluted share change of 0.02% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative OCF growth while 8070.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-100.00%
Negative FCF growth while 8070.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
122.09%
10Y CAGR of 122.09% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
107.36%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 8070.HK's 63.89%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
57.99%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 8070.HK's 50.00%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 8070.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
100.00%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to 8070.HK's 100.00%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
181.47%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 181.47% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
262.04%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 8070.HK's 153.67%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
817.03%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 8070.HK's 262.41%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
164.80%
Equity/share CAGR of 164.80% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
51.31%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-34.99%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-100.00%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-100.00%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-100.00%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.83%
We expand SG&A while 8070.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.