PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-20.05%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
34.37%
Positive gross profit growth while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
2053.11%
Positive EBIT growth while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
456.26%
Positive operating income growth while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
712.98%
Positive net income growth while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
725.00%
Positive EPS growth while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
725.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 8070.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative OCF growth while 8070.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-100.00%
Negative FCF growth while 8070.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
130.57%
10Y CAGR of 130.57% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
195.33%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 8070.HK's 111.00%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
21.71%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 8070.HK's 69.87%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 8070.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
132.25%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 132.25% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
931.49%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 8070.HK's 374.74%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
155.08%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 8070.HK's 26.44%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
249.92%
Equity/share CAGR of 249.92% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
-12.44%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 8070.HK is at 3.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
20.01%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 8070.HK's 27.83%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-100.00%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-100.00%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-100.00%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.26%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.