0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.15%
Revenue growth under 50% of 8070.HK's 31.44%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
2.52%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 8070.HK's 50.48%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-103.63%
Negative EBIT growth while 8070.HK is at 38.16%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-169.74%
Negative operating income growth while 8070.HK is at 77.22%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-135.19%
Negative net income growth while 8070.HK stands at 79.24%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-134.48%
Negative EPS growth while 8070.HK is at 178.80%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-134.48%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 8070.HK is at 178.80%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
129.46%
10Y CAGR of 129.46% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
-8.12%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 8070.HK stands at 219.45%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
24.97%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 8070.HK's 237.81%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-71.93%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 8070.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-128.02%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 8070.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-393.90%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 8070.HK is 350.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
50.73%
Below 50% of 8070.HK's 1228.94%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
154.36%
Equity/share CAGR of 154.36% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
-10.82%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 8070.HK is at 33.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
74.06%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 8070.HK's 57.08%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.04%
SG&A growth well above 8070.HK's 53.82%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.