PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.88%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 8070.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-37.19%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 8070.HK stands at 38.07%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-52.47%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8070.HK stands at 8.34%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
254.81%
OCF/share CAGR of 254.81% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
-79.81%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 8070.HK is at 1579.57%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-84.21%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 8070.HK stands at 912.40%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
1.99%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 1.99% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
20.02%
Below 50% of 8070.HK's 377.66%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-153.88%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8070.HK is 71.83%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.64%
Below 50% of 8070.HK's 97.74%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-24.26%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 8070.HK is at 68.22%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.