PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.49%
Negative revenue growth while 8070.HK stands at 26.02%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
2.16%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 8070.HK's 17.98%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-3.22%
Negative EBIT growth while 8070.HK is at 22.55%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-94.94%
Negative operating income growth while 8070.HK is at 493.56%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-30.05%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-29.85%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-29.85%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.37%
Share reduction while 8070.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-8.89%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 8070.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-33.53%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 8070.HK stands at 124.56%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-54.45%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8070.HK stands at 25.17%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-238.05%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 8070.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-112.45%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 8070.HK is 273.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-200.19%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8070.HK is 214.31%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.03%
Firm’s AR is declining while 8070.HK shows 54.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-11.20%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-19.14%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-15.53%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.71%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 8070.HK's 16.13%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.