PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.80%
10Y CAGR of 7.80% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
-41.29%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 8070.HK stands at 101.86%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-62.84%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 8070.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 8070.HK stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-220.39%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 8070.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-111.68%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 8070.HK is 537.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-613.11%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8070.HK is 1.15%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
37.14%
Equity/share CAGR of 37.14% while 8070.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
-6.15%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 8070.HK is at 62.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-42.61%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 8070.HK is at 21.86%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.