PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
15.82%
Revenue growth under 50% of 8095.HK's 81.61%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-41.31%
Negative gross profit growth while 8095.HK is at 71.96%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
0.75%
EBIT growth below 50% of 8095.HK's 308.12%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
51.95%
Operating income growth under 50% of 8095.HK's 130.84%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-4.38%
Negative net income growth while 8095.HK stands at 589.37%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-10.00%
Negative EPS growth while 8095.HK is at 587.27%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-10.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 8095.HK is at 587.27%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.71%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 8095.HK's 1139.70%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
33.71%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 8095.HK's 176.23%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
33.71%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of 8095.HK's 59.12%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
100.00%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 8095.HK's 726.75%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
100.00%
Positive OCF/share growth while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
100.00%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
113.90%
Below 50% of 8095.HK's 1871.48%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
113.90%
Below 50% of 8095.HK's 624.27%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
113.90%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of 8095.HK's 199.72%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.06%
We cut SG&A while 8095.HK invests at 19.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.