PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
36.50%
Revenue growth under 50% of 8095.HK's 86.60%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
82.42%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 8095.HK's 206.51%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
706.52%
EBIT growth above 1.5x 8095.HK's 219.34%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
1395.14%
Operating income growth under 50% of 8095.HK's 3949.80%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
1620.13%
Net income growth above 1.5x 8095.HK's 226.44%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
1537.50%
EPS growth above 1.5x 8095.HK's 219.77%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
1537.50%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 8095.HK's 219.77%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative OCF growth while 8095.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-100.00%
Negative FCF growth while 8095.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
101.79%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 8095.HK's 50.78%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
101.79%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
45.34%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.71%
Below 50% of 8095.HK's 1253.85%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
81.71%
Below 50% of 8095.HK's 270.16%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
567.09%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 8095.HK's 5.05%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.15%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 8095.HK's 176.49%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.