PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.65%
Positive revenue growth while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
19.79%
Positive gross profit growth while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
25.53%
Positive EBIT growth while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
81.17%
Positive operating income growth while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
13.97%
Positive net income growth while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
13.91%
Positive EPS growth while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
13.91%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
142.69%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 8095.HK's 11.12%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
142.69%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-2.83%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.60%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
80.60%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
3283.33%
Positive short-term CAGR while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
81.84%
Below 50% of 8095.HK's 238.83%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
81.84%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 8095.HK's 128.68%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
-36.25%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 8095.HK is at 67.15%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.51%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.