PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.94%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-18.47%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-30.78%
Negative EBIT growth while 8095.HK is at 120.20%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-50.06%
Negative operating income growth while 8095.HK is at 777.61%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-30.56%
Negative net income growth while 8095.HK stands at 113.75%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-30.53%
Negative EPS growth while 8095.HK is at 113.72%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-30.53%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 8095.HK is at 113.72%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.02%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x 8095.HK's 0.22%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative OCF growth while 8095.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-100.00%
Negative FCF growth while 8095.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
122.09%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 8095.HK's 101.48%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
107.36%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
57.99%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-100.00%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
100.00%
Positive OCF/share growth while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
181.47%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 8095.HK's 274.18%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
262.04%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
817.03%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 8095.HK's 6.79%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
164.80%
Equity/share CAGR of 164.80% while 8095.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
51.31%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of 8095.HK's 57.51%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
-34.99%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 8095.HK is at 24.51%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-100.00%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-100.00%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-100.00%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.83%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 8095.HK's 771.65%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.