0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.64%
Revenue growth under 50% of 8095.HK's 10.63%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
4.53%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 8095.HK's 34.81%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
36.67%
EBIT growth below 50% of 8095.HK's 188.91%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
-51.57%
Negative operating income growth while 8095.HK is at 168.11%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
36.48%
Net income growth under 50% of 8095.HK's 241.64%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
36.26%
EPS growth under 50% of 8095.HK's 211.97%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
35.16%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of 8095.HK's 211.97%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.46%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x 8095.HK's 9.61%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
85.39%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 8095.HK's 18.14%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
85.39%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
38.65%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1080.63%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
1080.63%
Positive OCF/share growth while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
281.91%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 8095.HK's 54.92% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
281.91%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
1208.99%
Positive short-term CAGR while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.28%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 8095.HK is at 56.12%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.68%
SG&A growth well above 8095.HK's 3.70%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.