PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
22.58%
Positive revenue growth while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-39.54%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-103.88%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-119.64%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-114.05%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-113.79%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-113.79%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.32%
Reduced diluted shares while 8095.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
190.10%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
161.68%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
73.77%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-116.88%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 8095.HK is at 1785.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-12.13%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 8095.HK is 130.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
97.30%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of 8095.HK's 176.59%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
138.95%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 8095.HK's 221.63%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
-15.89%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 8095.HK is at 96.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
16.48%
Below 50% of 8095.HK's 65.14%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.57%
We cut SG&A while 8095.HK invests at 1.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.