PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.15%
Positive revenue growth while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
2.52%
Positive gross profit growth while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-103.63%
Negative EBIT growth while 8095.HK is at 202.81%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-169.74%
Negative operating income growth while 8095.HK is at 1536.86%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-135.19%
Negative net income growth while 8095.HK stands at 307.55%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-134.48%
Negative EPS growth while 8095.HK is at 310.56%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-134.48%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 8095.HK is at 310.56%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
129.46%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-8.12%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
24.97%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 8095.HK's 79.27%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-71.93%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 8095.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-128.02%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 8095.HK is at 886.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-393.90%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 8095.HK is 287.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
50.73%
Positive short-term CAGR while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
154.36%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 8095.HK's 232.39%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
-10.82%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 8095.HK is at 83.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
74.06%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 8095.HK's 12.52%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.04%
We expand SG&A while 8095.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.