PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-46.72%
Negative revenue growth while 8095.HK stands at 44.59%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-65.99%
Negative gross profit growth while 8095.HK is at 1424.91%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-875.00%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
46.72%
Positive operating income growth while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-292.43%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-295.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-295.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative OCF growth while 8095.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-100.00%
Negative FCF growth while 8095.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
21.55%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-13.53%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-32.54%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-100.00%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-346.79%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 8095.HK is at 505.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-904.05%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-54.81%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8095.HK is 187.29%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
276.02%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 8095.HK's 156.62%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
-7.69%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 8095.HK is at 36.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
79.15%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 8095.HK's 10.37%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
100.00%
We show growth while 8095.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-100.00%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-100.00%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-100.00%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-52.58%
We cut SG&A while 8095.HK invests at 1.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.