0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.52%
Revenue growth under 50% of 8095.HK's 34.96%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
14.32%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of 8095.HK's 18.47%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
-78.78%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-66.97%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-12.33%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-12.68%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-12.68%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.50%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-27.82%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-50.35%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8095.HK stands at 53.54%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.17%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 8095.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-210.52%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
82.33%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-161.19%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
95.87%
Below 50% of 8095.HK's 221.11%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-4.52%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 8095.HK is at 88.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
7.72%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 8095.HK's 11.72%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.04%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 8095.HK's 72.01%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.