PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.49%
Negative revenue growth while 8095.HK stands at 32.25%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
2.16%
Positive gross profit growth while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-3.22%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-94.94%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-30.05%
Negative net income growth while 8095.HK stands at 1841.68%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-29.85%
Negative EPS growth while 8095.HK is at 1840.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-29.85%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 8095.HK is at 1840.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.37%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-8.89%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-33.53%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 8095.HK stands at 128.96%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-54.45%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8095.HK stands at 13.03%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-238.05%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-112.45%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 8095.HK is 18.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-200.19%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.03%
Firm’s AR is declining while 8095.HK shows 6.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-11.20%
Negative asset growth while 8095.HK invests at 0.75%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-19.14%
We have a declining book value while 8095.HK shows 1.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-15.53%
We’re deleveraging while 8095.HK stands at 2.06%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.71%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 8095.HK's 209.72%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.