PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
390.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.22%
Revenue growth of 13.22% vs. zero growth in General Transportation. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
-3.20%
Negative gross profit growth while General Transportation median is -4.76%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
36.76%
Positive EBIT growth while General Transportation median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
-649.64%
Negative operating income growth while General Transportation median is -1.71%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-0.37%
Negative net income growth while General Transportation median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.62%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x General Transportation median of 71.47%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if consistent reinvestment or product expansions drive this gap.
83.62%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x General Transportation median of 38.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
65.63%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x General Transportation median of 26.09%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-156.87%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. General Transportation median of 71.80%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-156.87%
Negative 5Y CAGR while General Transportation median is 21.55%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-277.76%
Negative 3Y CAGR while General Transportation median is 23.54%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
46.13%
Equity/share CAGR 50-75% of General Transportation median. Guy Spier sees subpar expansion vs. peers’ net worth growth.
46.13%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x General Transportation median. Mohnish Pabrai might see disciplined retention of earnings behind outperformance.
-48.56%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while General Transportation median is 25.16%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.00%
SG&A growth of 21.00% while General Transportation median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.