0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.42%
Negative revenue growth while General Transportation median is -2.05%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-27.58%
Negative gross profit growth while General Transportation median is -5.16%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
39.97%
Positive EBIT growth while General Transportation median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
30.52%
Positive operating income growth while General Transportation is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
16.54%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x General Transportation median of 0.06%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
16.25%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x General Transportation median of 0.74%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
16.25%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x General Transportation median of 0.74%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
0.01%
Share change of 0.01% while General Transportation median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-73.69%
Negative OCF growth while General Transportation median is -20.86%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-73.69%
Negative FCF growth while General Transportation median is -2.46%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
7.30%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of General Transportation median of 76.17%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
-43.36%
Negative 5Y CAGR while General Transportation median is 31.80%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-51.69%
Negative 3Y CAGR while General Transportation median is 29.77%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-39.61%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while General Transportation median is 109.61%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-306.99%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. General Transportation median of 67.46%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
50.91%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x General Transportation median. Mohnish Pabrai would check that top-line growth and share count management both contribute.
-173.54%
Negative 3Y CAGR while General Transportation median is -13.54%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
142.79%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x General Transportation median of 43.24% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
-16.73%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while General Transportation median is 15.83%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-8.31%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while General Transportation median is 7.27%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.26%
AR shrinking while General Transportation median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-37.46%
Decreasing inventory while General Transportation is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
23.13%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x General Transportation median of 0.15%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-13.13%
Negative BV/share change while General Transportation median is 1.02%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
172.72%
Slightly rising debt while General Transportation median is deleveraging. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm lags behind peers in risk control or invests in more expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.32%
SG&A decline while General Transportation grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.