PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.42%
Negative revenue growth while Industrials median is -5.08%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-27.58%
Negative gross profit growth while Industrials median is -3.85%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
39.97%
Positive EBIT growth while Industrials median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
30.52%
Positive operating income growth while Industrials is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
16.54%
Positive net income growth while Industrials median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
16.25%
Positive EPS growth while Industrials median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
16.25%
Positive diluted EPS growth while Industrials median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a real advantage in how this firm manages share count or drives net income.
0.01%
Share change of 0.01% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-73.69%
Negative OCF growth while Industrials median is -3.79%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-73.69%
Negative FCF growth while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
7.30%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Industrials median of 28.48%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
-43.36%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Industrials median is 17.13%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-51.69%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Industrials median is 19.30%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-39.61%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-306.99%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Industrials median of 48.68%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
50.91%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Industrials median of 30.43%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
-173.54%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Industrials median is 17.29%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
142.79%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Industrials median of 44.26% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
-16.73%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Industrials median is 26.57%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-8.31%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Industrials median is 18.34%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.26%
AR shrinking while Industrials median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-37.46%
Decreasing inventory while Industrials is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
23.13%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Industrials median of 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-13.13%
Negative BV/share change while Industrials median is 0.63%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
172.72%
Slightly rising debt while Industrials median is deleveraging. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm lags behind peers in risk control or invests in more expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.32%
SG&A decline while Industrials grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.