PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
12.69%
Positive growth while 8028.HK shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
14.52%
Cost growth less than half of 8028.HK's 256.89%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
6.31%
Positive growth while 8028.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-5.67%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.95%
G&A reduction while 8028.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.24%
Other expenses reduction while 8028.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-12.52%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
9.97%
Total costs growth less than half of 8028.HK's 40.04%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-74.19%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-94.06%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
43.74%
EBITDA growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
27.55%
EBITDA margin growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
52.79%
Operating income growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
35.58%
Operating margin growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-96.28%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
44.78%
Pre-tax income growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
28.47%
Pre-tax margin growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.22%
Tax expense growth while 8028.HK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
52.89%
Net income growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
35.67%
Net margin growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.29%
EPS growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.33%
Share count reduction below 50% of 8028.HK's 18.52%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
33.33%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of 8028.HK's 18.52%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.