0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.20%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-19.17%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-19.30%
Gross profit decline while 8028.HK shows 101.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.13%
Margin decline while 8028.HK shows 209.48% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.18%
G&A change of 69.18% while 8028.HK maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-105.88%
Other expenses reduction while 8028.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
68.76%
Operating expenses growth less than half of 8028.HK's 265.81%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-7.40%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-12.50%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
3000.00%
D&A growth above 1.5x 8028.HK's 111.07%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-131.82%
EBITDA decline while 8028.HK shows 39.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-139.38%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-142.56%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-152.67%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1800.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x 8028.HK's 94.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-139.91%
Pre-tax income decline while 8028.HK shows 34.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-149.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-36.83%
Tax expense reduction while 8028.HK shows 172.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-158.05%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-171.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-177.78%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-177.78%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.00%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-25.00%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.