PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-28.08%
Revenue decline while 8028.HK shows 9.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-21.63%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-46.01%
Gross profit decline while 8028.HK shows 211.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-24.93%
Margin decline while 8028.HK shows 202.27% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-51.58%
G&A reduction while 8028.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4050.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-51.60%
Operating expenses reduction while 8028.HK shows 720.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-29.43%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-23.08%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
66.40%
D&A growth less than half of 8028.HK's 137.48%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
182.93%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x 8028.HK's 80.58%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
293.40%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x 8028.HK's 82.23%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
82.95%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x 8028.HK's 55.98%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
154.39%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x 8028.HK's 59.73%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
64.23%
Other expenses growth while 8028.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
190.45%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x 8028.HK's 68.02%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
303.86%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x 8028.HK's 70.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-40.04%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
167.65%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x 8028.HK's 51.89%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
194.07%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x 8028.HK's 55.99%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
163.64%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x 8028.HK's 52.11%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
163.64%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x 8028.HK's 52.11%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.52%
Share count reduction below 50% of 8028.HK's 0.20%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.