PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
40.79%
Revenue growth below 50% of 8028.HK's 157.37%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
46.31%
Cost growth less than half of 8028.HK's 179.88%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
18.55%
Gross profit growth below 50% of 8028.HK's 97.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-15.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.75%
G&A change of 27.75% while 8028.HK maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
284.34%
Other expenses growth while 8028.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
27.76%
Operating expenses growth while 8028.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
43.00%
Total costs growth less than half of 8028.HK's 150.55%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
2130.00%
Interest expense growth while 8028.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
284.34%
D&A growth less than half of 8028.HK's 1354.61%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-27.49%
EBITDA decline while 8028.HK shows 532.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.50%
EBITDA margin decline while 8028.HK shows 268.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-46.41%
Operating income decline while 8028.HK shows 212.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-61.93%
Operating margin decline while 8028.HK shows 143.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
27.96%
Other expenses growth while 8028.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-48.36%
Pre-tax income decline while 8028.HK shows 352.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-63.32%
Pre-tax margin decline while 8028.HK shows 198.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-88.15%
Tax expense reduction while 8028.HK shows 501.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6.44%
Net income growth below 50% of 8028.HK's 159.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-24.40%
Net margin decline while 8028.HK shows 123.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
14.29%
EPS growth below 50% of 8028.HK's 159.34%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of 8028.HK's 159.34%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.54%
Share count reduction while 8028.HK shows 0.01% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.