PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
52.04%
Positive growth while 8028.HK shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
54.85%
Cost increase while 8028.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
31.81%
Positive growth while 8028.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-13.30%
Margin decline while 8028.HK shows 54.87% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.37%
G&A change of 49.37% while 8028.HK maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
188.24%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x 8028.HK's 72.08%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
49.56%
Operating expenses growth while 8028.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
54.29%
Total costs growth while 8028.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-63.19%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-333.33%
D&A reduction while 8028.HK shows 355.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-83.21%
EBITDA decline while 8028.HK shows 67.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-88.96%
EBITDA margin decline while 8028.HK shows 385.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-70.86%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-80.83%
Operating margin decline while 8028.HK shows 128.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.61%
Other expenses reduction while 8028.HK shows 176.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-85.67%
Pre-tax income decline while 8028.HK shows 67.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-90.57%
Pre-tax margin decline while 8028.HK shows 385.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.66%
Tax expense growth less than half of 8028.HK's 58.02%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-123.88%
Net income decline while 8028.HK shows 673.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-115.71%
Net margin decline while 8028.HK shows 1757.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-123.53%
EPS decline while 8028.HK shows 669.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-123.53%
Diluted EPS decline while 8028.HK shows 669.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.