PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
390.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.62%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-11.53%
Cost reduction while 8028.HK shows 9.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
76.68%
Positive growth while 8028.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
87.20%
Margin expansion while 8028.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.05%
G&A change of 1.05% while 8028.HK maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-324.36%
Other expenses reduction while 8028.HK shows 6.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
1.05%
Operating expenses growth less than half of 8028.HK's 31.62%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-10.21%
Total costs reduction while 8028.HK shows 10.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.83%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-56.87%
D&A reduction while 8028.HK shows 187.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
142.10%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x 8028.HK's 66.21%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
144.60%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x 8028.HK's 96.33%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
119.54%
Operating income growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
120.71%
Operating margin growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-328.76%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
51.09%
Pre-tax income growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
48.18%
Pre-tax margin growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-19.44%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
50.86%
Net income growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
47.94%
Net margin growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.60%
EPS growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.60%
Diluted EPS growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.