PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.30%
Revenue decline while 8028.HK shows 12443.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
0.55%
Cost growth less than half of 8028.HK's 506.88%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-16.70%
Gross profit decline while 8028.HK shows 696.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-15.61%
Margin decline while 8028.HK shows 104.75% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.27%
G&A reduction while 8028.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-73.19%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-25.12%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-3.13%
Total costs reduction while 8028.HK shows 50.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-37.87%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-98.05%
D&A reduction while 8028.HK shows 30.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-145.58%
EBITDA decline while 8028.HK shows 465.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-148.81%
EBITDA margin decline while 8028.HK shows 102.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
46.48%
Operating income growth below 50% of 8028.HK's 213.58%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
45.78%
Operating margin growth below 50% of 8028.HK's 100.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-145.42%
Other expenses reduction while 8028.HK shows 100.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.85%
Pre-tax income decline while 8028.HK shows 110.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.18%
Pre-tax margin decline while 8028.HK shows 100.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
99.55%
Tax expense growth 50-75% of 8028.HK's 144.14%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-24.90%
Net income decline while 8028.HK shows 103.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.54%
Net margin decline while 8028.HK shows 100.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.39%
EPS decline while 8028.HK shows 103.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.39%
Diluted EPS decline while 8028.HK shows 103.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.