0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.64%
Positive growth while 8028.HK shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.13%
Cost increase while 8028.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
4.53%
Positive growth while 8028.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.84%
Margin expansion 1.25-1.5x 8028.HK's 2.23%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.68%
G&A change of 33.68% while 8028.HK maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11368.97%
Other expenses growth while 8028.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
35.32%
Operating expenses growth while 8028.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.65%
Total costs growth while 8028.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.93%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x 8028.HK's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
1905.66%
D&A growth while 8028.HK reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
36.67%
EBITDA growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
34.46%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x 8028.HK's 4.59%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-51.57%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-52.36%
Operating margin decline while 8028.HK shows 4.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
942.27%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x 8028.HK's 214.94%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
41.07%
Pre-tax income growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
38.80%
Pre-tax margin growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
86.32%
Tax expense growth while 8028.HK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
36.48%
Net income growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
34.28%
Net margin growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.26%
EPS growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
35.16%
Diluted EPS growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.46%
Diluted share change of 0.46% while 8028.HK is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.