PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
230.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.37 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.15%
Growth of 14.15% while 8028.HK shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
16.55%
Cost growth 50-75% of 8028.HK's 31.94%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
2.52%
Positive growth while 8028.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-10.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.04%
G&A change of 51.04% while 8028.HK maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
162.38%
Other expenses growth while 8028.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
74.70%
Operating expenses growth while 8028.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
23.89%
Total costs growth while 8028.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-24.17%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
2221.33%
D&A growth while 8028.HK reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-103.63%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-103.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-169.74%
Operating income decline while 8028.HK shows 47.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-161.10%
Operating margin decline while 8028.HK shows 47.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
619.11%
Other expenses growth while 8028.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-127.45%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-124.05%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-118.65%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-135.19%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-130.83%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-134.48%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-134.48%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.