PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-15.37%
Revenue decline while 8028.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-14.85%
Cost reduction while 8028.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-20.11%
Gross profit decline while 8028.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-5.60%
Margin decline while 8028.HK shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.54%
G&A reduction while 8028.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15185.71%
Other expenses reduction while 8028.HK shows 20.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-24.52%
Operating expenses reduction while 8028.HK shows 17.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.28%
Total costs reduction while 8028.HK shows 16.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-42.53%
Interest expense reduction while 8028.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1719.92%
D&A growth above 1.5x 8028.HK's 567.89%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-28.33%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-51.63%
EBITDA margin decline while 8028.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.83%
Operating income decline while 8028.HK shows 11.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-53.40%
Operating margin decline while 8028.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.43%
Other expenses growth while 8028.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.34%
Pre-tax income growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-13.03%
Pre-tax margin decline while 8028.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
87.59%
Tax expense growth while 8028.HK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.11%
Net income growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-9.76%
Net margin decline while 8028.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.33%
EPS growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.33%
Diluted EPS growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.