PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.33%
Growth of 6.33% while 8028.HK shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
4.74%
Cost growth less than half of 8028.HK's 25729.12%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
21.86%
Gross profit growth below 50% of 8028.HK's 782.42%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.61%
Margin change of 14.61% while 8028.HK shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.92%
G&A change of 12.92% while 8028.HK maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.17%
Other expenses growth while 8028.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.68%
Operating expenses growth less than half of 8028.HK's 209.13%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
5.93%
Total costs growth less than half of 8028.HK's 933.27%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
2.53%
Interest expense growth while 8028.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-94.51%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
34.27%
EBITDA growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
38.18%
Margin change of 38.18% while 8028.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
7.95%
Operating income growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.42%
Margin change of 13.42% while 8028.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-0.31%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
5.53%
Pre-tax income growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.15%
Margin change of 11.15% while 8028.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-68.48%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
3.68%
Net income growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.41%
Margin change of 9.41% while 8028.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
4.05%
EPS growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.05%
Diluted EPS growth while 8028.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.