PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.20%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-19.17%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-19.30%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.13%
Margin decline while 8070.HK shows 11.85% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.18%
G&A growth 50-75% of 8070.HK's 107.77%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-105.88%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
68.76%
Similar operating expenses growth to 8070.HK's 88.42%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-7.40%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-12.50%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
3000.00%
D&A growth while 8070.HK reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-131.82%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-139.38%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-142.56%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-152.67%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1800.00%
Other expenses growth while 8070.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-139.91%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-149.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-36.83%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-158.05%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-171.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-177.78%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-177.78%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.00%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-25.00%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.