PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.13%
Revenue growth 50-75% of 8070.HK's 20.37%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
25.12%
Cost growth 1.1-1.25x 8070.HK's 20.34%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of cost control initiatives.
-32.23%
Gross profit decline while 8070.HK shows 20.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-40.09%
Margin decline while 8070.HK shows 0.08% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.76%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5000.00%
Other expenses reduction while 8070.HK shows 232.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-27.76%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
12.22%
Total costs growth while 8070.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
214.29%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x 8070.HK's 9.80%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-112.66%
D&A reduction while 8070.HK shows 1105.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-15.51%
EBITDA decline while 8070.HK shows 163.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.10%
EBITDA margin decline while 8070.HK shows 153.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.47%
Operating income growth below 50% of 8070.HK's 119.49%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
18.21%
Operating margin growth below 50% of 8070.HK's 116.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-154.89%
Other expenses reduction while 8070.HK shows 112.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.16%
Pre-tax income decline while 8070.HK shows 119.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.69%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of 8070.HK's 115.82%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
100.41%
Tax expense growth less than half of 8070.HK's 5635.71%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-20.98%
Net income decline while 8070.HK shows 107.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.94%
Net margin decline while 8070.HK shows 105.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.43%
EPS decline while 8070.HK shows 105.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.43%
Diluted EPS decline while 8070.HK shows 105.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.49%
Share count reduction while 8070.HK shows 23.18% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.49%
Diluted share reduction while 8070.HK shows 23.18% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.