0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.32%
Positive growth while 8070.HK shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-11.73%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
140.37%
Positive growth while 8070.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
123.98%
Margin expansion while 8070.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.67%
G&A growth while 8070.HK reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-190.20%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
33.65%
Operating expenses growth while 8070.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.61%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-40.91%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-190.20%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
328.29%
EBITDA growth while 8070.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
312.73%
EBITDA margin growth while 8070.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
320.99%
Operating income growth while 8070.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
305.92%
Operating margin growth while 8070.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-120.55%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
305.48%
Pre-tax income growth while 8070.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
291.47%
Pre-tax margin growth while 8070.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.21%
Tax expense growth while 8070.HK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
205.65%
Net income growth while 8070.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
198.45%
Net margin growth while 8070.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
179.41%
EPS growth while 8070.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
179.41%
Diluted EPS growth while 8070.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.99%
Share count increase while 8070.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
33.99%
Diluted share increase while 8070.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.