PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
52.04%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x 8070.HK's 11.64%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
54.85%
Cost growth above 1.5x 8070.HK's 10.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
31.81%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x 8070.HK's 19.59%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-13.30%
Margin decline while 8070.HK shows 7.13% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.37%
G&A growth 1.1-1.25x 8070.HK's 41.26%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of necessary spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
188.24%
Other expenses growth less than half of 8070.HK's 838.30%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
49.56%
Similar operating expenses growth to 8070.HK's 49.04%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
54.29%
Total costs growth above 1.5x 8070.HK's 17.41%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-63.19%
Interest expense reduction while 8070.HK shows 3.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-333.33%
D&A reduction while 8070.HK shows 4.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-83.21%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-88.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-70.86%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-80.83%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.61%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-85.67%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-90.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.66%
Tax expense growth while 8070.HK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-123.88%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-115.71%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-123.53%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-123.53%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.