PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.94%
Revenue decline while 8070.HK shows 15.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-5.78%
Cost reduction while 8070.HK shows 12.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-18.47%
Gross profit decline while 8070.HK shows 28.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-11.43%
Margin decline while 8070.HK shows 11.65% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.83%
G&A growth above 1.5x 8070.HK's 13.83%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.67%
Other expenses reduction while 8070.HK shows 120.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
24.91%
Operating expenses growth while 8070.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.34%
Total costs reduction while 8070.HK shows 8.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-21.35%
Interest expense reduction while 8070.HK shows 39.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-94.54%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-30.78%
EBITDA decline while 8070.HK shows 272.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.81%
EBITDA margin decline while 8070.HK shows 223.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-50.06%
Operating income decline while 8070.HK shows 180.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-45.75%
Operating margin decline while 8070.HK shows 143.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
68.12%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of 8070.HK's 104.63%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
-32.43%
Pre-tax income decline while 8070.HK shows 344.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.60%
Pre-tax margin decline while 8070.HK shows 286.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-40.62%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-30.56%
Net income decline while 8070.HK shows 342.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.57%
Net margin decline while 8070.HK shows 284.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.53%
EPS decline while 8070.HK shows 636.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.53%
Diluted EPS decline while 8070.HK shows 636.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.02%
Diluted share change of 0.02% while 8070.HK is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.