PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.64%
Similar revenue growth to 8070.HK's 1.92%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
1.13%
Cost growth less than half of 8070.HK's 6.32%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
4.53%
Positive growth while 8070.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.84%
Margin expansion while 8070.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.68%
G&A growth while 8070.HK reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11368.97%
Other expenses growth while 8070.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
35.32%
Operating expenses growth while 8070.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.65%
Similar total costs growth to 8070.HK's 4.82%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
14.93%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x 8070.HK's 3.96%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
1905.66%
D&A growth above 1.5x 8070.HK's 197.58%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
36.67%
EBITDA growth while 8070.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
34.46%
EBITDA margin growth while 8070.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-51.57%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-52.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
942.27%
Other expenses growth while 8070.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
41.07%
Pre-tax income growth while 8070.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
38.80%
Pre-tax margin growth while 8070.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
86.32%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x 8070.HK's 47.62%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
36.48%
Net income growth while 8070.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
34.28%
Net margin growth while 8070.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.26%
EPS growth while 8070.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
35.16%
Diluted EPS growth while 8070.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.46%
Diluted share change of 0.46% while 8070.HK is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.