PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.94%
Revenue decline while 8070.HK shows 17.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-3.35%
Cost reduction while 8070.HK shows 19.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-22.22%
Gross profit decline while 8070.HK shows 8.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-17.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.90%
G&A growth above 1.5x 8070.HK's 17.38%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2746.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
15.00%
Operating expenses growth while 8070.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.50%
Total costs reduction while 8070.HK shows 17.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.50%
Interest expense growth while 8070.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1888.42%
D&A growth above 1.5x 8070.HK's 308.10%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-104.60%
EBITDA decline while 8070.HK shows 52.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-104.89%
EBITDA margin decline while 8070.HK shows 29.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-125.78%
Operating income decline while 8070.HK shows 34.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-127.41%
Operating margin decline while 8070.HK shows 14.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
54.84%
Other expenses growth less than half of 8070.HK's 164.74%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-133.08%
Pre-tax income decline while 8070.HK shows 67.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-135.17%
Pre-tax margin decline while 8070.HK shows 42.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-118.45%
Tax expense reduction while 8070.HK shows 110.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-132.18%
Net income decline while 8070.HK shows 58.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-134.21%
Net margin decline while 8070.HK shows 34.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-132.00%
EPS decline while 8070.HK shows 58.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-132.00%
Diluted EPS decline while 8070.HK shows 58.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.55%
Share count reduction while 8070.HK shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.