PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.15%
Revenue growth below 50% of 8070.HK's 31.44%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
16.55%
Cost growth 50-75% of 8070.HK's 28.17%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
2.52%
Gross profit growth below 50% of 8070.HK's 50.48%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-10.18%
Margin decline while 8070.HK shows 14.48% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.04%
G&A growth 50-75% of 8070.HK's 70.17%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
162.38%
Other expenses growth while 8070.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
74.70%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x 8070.HK's 43.07%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
23.89%
Similar total costs growth to 8070.HK's 29.63%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-24.17%
Interest expense reduction while 8070.HK shows 17.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2221.33%
D&A growth above 1.5x 8070.HK's 447.75%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-103.63%
EBITDA decline while 8070.HK shows 52.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-103.18%
EBITDA margin decline while 8070.HK shows 16.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-169.74%
Operating income decline while 8070.HK shows 77.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-161.10%
Operating margin decline while 8070.HK shows 34.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
619.11%
Other expenses growth while 8070.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-127.45%
Pre-tax income decline while 8070.HK shows 40.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-124.05%
Pre-tax margin decline while 8070.HK shows 7.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-118.65%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-135.19%
Net income decline while 8070.HK shows 79.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-130.83%
Net margin decline while 8070.HK shows 36.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-134.48%
EPS decline while 8070.HK shows 178.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-134.48%
Diluted EPS decline while 8070.HK shows 178.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.