PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.42%
Revenue decline while 8070.HK shows 34.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-8.28%
Cost reduction while 8070.HK shows 35.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-27.58%
Gross profit decline while 8070.HK shows 32.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-19.16%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while 8070.HK shows 4.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-28.71%
Operating expenses reduction while 8070.HK shows 13.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-11.71%
Total costs reduction while 8070.HK shows 30.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
291.71%
D&A growth above 1.5x 8070.HK's 149.15%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
55.21%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of 8070.HK's 92.96%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
50.00%
EBITDA margin growth 1.25-1.5x 8070.HK's 43.23%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
30.52%
Operating income growth while 8070.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.44%
Operating margin growth while 8070.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-15.07%
Other expenses reduction while 8070.HK shows 252.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
24.88%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of 8070.HK's 133.04%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
16.14%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of 8070.HK's 72.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
126.80%
Tax expense growth while 8070.HK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
16.54%
Net income growth below 50% of 8070.HK's 162.25%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.83%
Net margin growth below 50% of 8070.HK's 94.65%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
16.25%
EPS growth below 50% of 8070.HK's 163.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
16.25%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of 8070.HK's 163.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.01%
Share count increase while 8070.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.